After an extremely difficult bargaining session this summer, our team presents to you for consideration this tentative agreement.
Our bargaining team began negotiations optimistic that we would not see a repeat of bargaining from two years prior. The team made it extremely clear on the first day of this bargaining season that we needed to ensure there was sufficient time to engage in meaningful conversation and negotiation over both economic and non-economic terms. Additionally, we emphatically advocated for dedicated time to discuss units such as DNR and WSSB/CDHY, as they have unique limitations during the summer months. Not only did we experience delay after delay after delay, the state’s negotiator assigned to bargain with WPEA resigned mid summer, resulting in us being assigned a new negotiator, effectively starting over on explaining many of our open articles. The team was able to reach agreement on many of our non-economic items, but the state was unfortunately no where near what the team believed to be adequate compensation.
Our team’s initial proposals consisted of numerous workplace enhancements, looking at both economic and non-economic enhancements. In addition to a nearly 30% cost of living adjustment over the biennium, we recommended provisions around emergency sick leave when all other forms of leave are exhausted, telework guarantees, especially during periods of inclement weather, and stipends for the use of personnel devices. For our economic enhancement, we made proposals to recognize employees working in hazardous environments, longevity, degree completion, to name a few. We also attempted to expand the county premiums afforded to those who work in King County. We requested an expanded list of job classification adjustments, as well as a one time inflation offset amount.
The state’s last, best and final offer does provide some economic relief to our members, but how much longer can state employees continue to suffer under regressive wages? We must send a clear message that this must end now, and that our members deserve fair wages and improved working conditions. Each member should consider their current economic situation and determine if this ongoing approach by OFM is appropriate and sustainable. It is time to let them know we can no longer balance the state’s budget on the backs of our membership.
The General Government bargaining team is recommending a NO VOTE.
